Journal of the History of Sexuality Edited by Jeffrey Merrick and Bryant T. Oxford University Press, This volume was assembled "to illustrate the variety of materials that exists.
For each of these audiences, this volume has much to recommend it. Four sections, "Traditions," "Repression," "Representation," and "Revolution," include a range of documents organized chronologically within subtopics designed for each of the potential audiences. Homosexuality in early modern france a documentary collection main sections include a brief historiography, but the editors have chosen to leave many of the controversies largely unspoken, allowing the documents to tell the proverbial story.
In part a pragmatic choice more documents can be included if less attention is devoted to explication and historical apparatusthis is also a daring and generally successful pedagogical strategy. The organization favors encouraging engagement with the texts over textbook-style illustrative documents of a narrative, and the pedagogical advantage seems worth the risk. For scholars, Merrick and Ragan have selected a number of more obscure texts that invite reassessment of questions about notions of sexuality and comparisons with other national traditions.
Scholars may be slightly frustrated by the absence of a bibliography, no doubt a result of the economics of academic book publishing; however, Merrick and Ragan have ameliorated the problem by providing a Web link address with an up-to-date bibliography. As for lay readers, while at some points an inattentive or unsympathetic reader might have difficulty situating the texts, the underlying assumption is that most readers come to the material willing to explore notions of homosexuality and homosexual practices in the past, and accommodating seems not to be a part of the agenda.
Merrick and Ragan begin with "Traditions," a collection of theological, legal, and medical texts about "sodomy" that collectively reveal how and why anxiety about sodomy grafted primarily onto men. While the term referred to a variety of nonprocreative sexual acts, male homosexual sodomy was seen as disruptive of unspoken social and cultural norms about male privilege in a patriarchal society.
Even to those familiar with the centrality of religion in early modern legal and social structures, the degree to which the theological and legal traditions overlap in formulating cultural unease with male sodomy is striking. Whether this overlap is situational and only seems chronic by dint of repetition is not entirely clear.
For instance, Jean Benedicti's derogatory comments on Theodore Beza as a sexual deviant are clearly a strategy in the sectarian conflicts of the Wars of Religion, during which sexual slander was utilized routinely as a political weapon against adversaries of different religious convictions. But did that [End Page ] context then facilitate routine condemnations of sodomy in religious terms throughout the duration of the Old Regime?
That the editors chose not to highlight how texts may be responses to particular contexts seems to be an invitation to students and scholars to explore such questions, but it is perhaps a bit burdensome for the lay reader. On the other Homosexuality in early modern france a documentary collection, the collection enables all readers to trace the utilization of exemplary evidence across a broad expanse of time.
The transformation of a piece of information, such as St. Louis's condemnation of "buggers," from an unexamined truism to a piece of evidence utilized by Enlightenment philosophes to attack uncritical acceptance of historical truisms is a case in point. Similarly, earlier texts in the medical literature and are saturated with the language of deviant women as imperfect men, while the later ones, and deal with women as a different sex with properly female sexual functions. The texts collectively illustrate Thomas
Homosexuality in early modern france a documentary collection idea, in Making Sex: Harvard University Press,that the dominant paradigm moved from a notion of If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.
View freely available titles: Book titles OR Journal titles. Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
Journal of the History of Sexuality. Homosexuality in Early Modern France: In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Contact Contact Us Help. For the early modern meanings of sodomy, see Cynthia B.
Herrup, A House in Jr., eds., Homosexuality in Early Modern France: A Documentary Collection. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index.